-
This House Believes That Religious Conversion for Middle East Refugees Should Become the Criteria for Their Entrance to European Asylum Countries
Let’s start with what the possible criteria for acceptance are. There have been various cases with a similar tone: visa, passport, etc. So, it is established that there already are and have been parameters for acceptance. Now we have a different parameter being appealed for installation in the current status quo. This debate could be…
-
This House Regrets the Remilitarization of Japan
This is a pretty straightforward value-judgment motion which weighs the pros and cons, benefits and harms, of a remilitarization action, in the specific context of the motion happening in Japan. Expect both teams to agree not to discuss about the ramifications of remilitarization (or cancelling the remilitarization) in the future. Motions circulating around the wording…
-
As Its Member States, This House Would Disband NATO
When is a treaty disbanded? When is a treaty formed? What are the parameters that might constitute the disbanding and forming? And what are the criteria for a “good time” to disband and/or form? We could talk about the harms and goods. Okay, that’s one. But that’s not all. Because this is not an only…
-
Assuming Feasibility, This House Would Require a Re-Ratification of All International Treaties (For Example, The European Union and ASEAN) by Popular Referendum Every Decade
This.. is… difficult. Now, the only thing both teams need to know, and clarify, is that this setting takes the geographical context within a country. And as such, it is possible to have geographical bias where this motion is moral and practical to one country whilst being immoral and impractical at the same time towards…