There would be two separate places where this motion applies. The geographical bias would be, one, happening on liberal democratic countries (of course), and second, on the middle-east countries. Both teams would likely have to agree on these points: That feminist movement is currently distributed with unequal ideals, beliefs, and goals throughout the whole world….
The biggest question – who are we? No, that was not a philosophical question. That was a literal technical question necessary in order to properly identify the course of this debate. Let’s forget about being debaters in a debate chamber with adjudicators judging and assigning values and prices our insignificant lives for a moment. Let’s…
This.. is… difficult. Now, the only thing both teams need to know, and clarify, is that this setting takes the geographical context within a country. And as such, it is possible to have geographical bias where this motion is moral and practical to one country whilst being immoral and impractical at the same time towards…
Ayy, (one of) my personal favorites! You know, being an addict and such, ha ha. I have made sure that the wording of the motion doesn’t create any bias nor multi-interpretation. Like your typical general motions, geographical context should automatically, and also, upon no setup, be in your standard liberal democratic countries. And, also, again,…
Pretty straightforward motion, involves assumptions, does not create any possible multi-interpretations time-wise. So, pretty much, yeah. A straightforward motion. There are some arguments that might be tied really closely to some geographical factors, though. Another important thing to note, is that debaters should not fall into the trap of misinterpreting this motion into “THW kill…