The stipulations are clear, the geographical bias and context is explicitly worded, so this is pretty much a straightforward motion. The goal of this motion is to have a discourse that aims to seek the best way to improve a country (of course, you don’t say). That being said, of course both Team Affirmative and…
This is one of the classics that, by now, we expect almost all debate coaches will try to employ when being faced with ultra-extra-conservative debaters as their students. Risk-taker coaches are more likely to try running “This House Would Legalize Gay Marriage” as a stronger form of shock therapy, though, whilst coaches who are more…
A pretty straightforward motion. It would be helpful if Team Affirmative clarifies some (not-so) ambiguous wordings of the motion and sets up a proper debate, though. But even if not, the debate has a proper course already set. The wordings used just happen to have extra room for multi-interpretation. One important thing to note, is…
Macau Online WSDC 2021 Semi-Final (Canada vs Singapore) Motion: THW nationalise the research, development, and distribution of pharmaceuticals Infoslide: To nationalise means to transfer from private or regional ownership and control to state/government ownership and control. Proposition: Canada Opposition: Singapore Result: Prop wins on a 5-2 split Here’s the video: Macau Online WSDC 2021 Semifinals…
There would be two separate places where this motion applies. The geographical bias would be, one, happening on liberal democratic countries (of course), and second, on the middle-east countries. Both teams would likely have to agree on these points: That feminist movement is currently distributed with unequal ideals, beliefs, and goals throughout the whole world….