Geographical contexts might prove to be a (slight) problem in this debate, if not any. This pertains to the idea of patriarchal/matriarchal values that might differ in some middle-eastern countries and Islamic Sharia countries. Team Affirmative Argument 1: Because we would like to promote gender equality. Instead of this motion being an action of government…
Take a small look here. And then, you will encounter, under the list of patent offices, that there are various regional and international patent offices belonging to different countries with differing geopolitical stances and affiliations (Israel, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Canada – to mention some). Never mind about that piece of information. Our point, is, that…
Manya Gupta, WSDC 2019 Grand Final Check the video here. Opening Fractured bones become fractured communities. When you can’t call out a soldier that sexually assaulted you in Iraq, can’t call out a general who may have ordered this as a war tactic In a world where you think soldiers get everything right, that’s when everything…
Or ignore the first part of the wording of the motion, in order to make interpreting this debate more simply. …or maybe not. …..but maybe also yes. So, “This House Believes That It Is Illegitimate for Western States to Limit Immigration from Developing-World Countries” and let’s do the motion dissection. First, illegitimate means illegal. But…
Princeton IV 2021 Final Motion: THP a world where individuals treated everybody as though they carry equal moral weight, rather than a world where they treated their surrounding community as though they carry more moral weight OG: NUS LN OO: Cambridge ST Result: OG wins Nar Sher May, Deputy Prime Minister Here’s the video: https://youtu.be/kZw07BD5Z-0?t=1011…