This debate is related to Intersectionality and Social Movements Principles. Most of time, it will debate on the Room of debate: What is social movement’s future goals? Most of time, the answers are either social acceptance or individual meaningful life. If both, is it ideal to gain both? If not which one should be prioritized….
This.. is… difficult. Now, the only thing both teams need to know, and clarify, is that this setting takes the geographical context within a country. And as such, it is possible to have geographical bias where this motion is moral and practical to one country whilst being immoral and impractical at the same time towards…
Jacklin Kwan, Oxford IV 2020 Open Finals Member of Government Here’s the video: https://youtu.be/wJwtOUB-9XE?t=2888 Opening I think the framing that is symmetric on both sides is that people still need to make decisions based on a singular conception of truth, in order to not do contradictory shit. They still need to make decisions on policy…
Motion: THS the creation of an international court with a mandate to prosecute leaders for health crimes Infoslide: For the purposes of this debate “health crimes” are massive violations of the international health codes. For example, the unwillingness to comply with the WHO’s regulations on dealing with pandemics, a significant violation of norms on the…
In panic, I spent three entire minutes elaborating an argument of how the government would create reforms in education if the adjudicator supported my side. The opposing speaker struck my case down by simply saying, “No, the government will not do that. The government is only interested in getting re-elected. There are millions of externalities…