-
This House Believes That State Should Take Over the Custody of Children Whose Parent(s) Is Diagnosed with Psychiatric Disorder
A pretty straightforward motion. It would be helpful if Team Affirmative clarifies some (not-so) ambiguous wordings of the motion and sets up a proper debate, though. But even if not, the debate has a proper course already set. The wordings used just happen to have extra room for multi-interpretation. One important thing to note, is…
-
This House Believes That the Feminist Movement Should Endorse the Usage of Hijab
There would be two separate places where this motion applies. The geographical bias would be, one, happening on liberal democratic countries (of course), and second, on the middle-east countries. Both teams would likely have to agree on these points: That feminist movement is currently distributed with unequal ideals, beliefs, and goals throughout the whole world.…
-
Even If It Is Possible, This House Believes That Human Lifespan Should Not Exceed 100 Years
Pretty straightforward motion, involves assumptions, does not create any possible multi-interpretations time-wise. So, pretty much, yeah. A straightforward motion. There are some arguments that might be tied really closely to some geographical factors, though. Another important thing to note, is that debaters should not fall into the trap of misinterpreting this motion into “THW kill…
-
This House Believes That Countries with Proper Public Transport Modules Should Ban Private Transport
A pretty straightforward motion that leaves little to no multi-interpretation. Bear in mind, however, that “countries with proper public transport modules” should be immediately translated as “first-world countries”, as those countries are the only ones who are likely to have proper public transport modules. Team Affirmative It is important for Team Affirmative to properly set…
-
This House Believes That Disadvantaged Racial Minorities Should Be Granted Automatic Discount(s) in Criminal Sentencing
This motion is fairly straightforward and leaves little to no room for multi-interpretation. “Automatic Discount(s) in Criminal Sentencing”, however, is vaguely worded and it is the sole burden of the Affirmative Team to clear out any ambiguity. AFFIRMATIVE A strategically sound interpretation of automatic discount(s) for this debate would be a model in which racial…